Neonatal Resuscitation Practices in Romania: A Survey of the Romanian Association of Neonatology (ANR) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS)

Manuela Cucerea¹, Marta Simon¹, Silvia Maria Stoicescu², Ligia Daniela Blaga³, Radu Galiș⁴, Maria Stamatin⁵, Gabriela Olariu⁶, Maria Livia Ognean⁷

1 George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania
2 Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy: Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Carol Davila din Bucuresti
3 Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4 Oradea County Emergency Hospital: Spitalul Clinic Judetean De Urgenta Oradea
5 Grigore T Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi Faculty of Medicine: Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Grigore T Popa lasi Facultatea de MedicinaRinggold ID 162290
6 Emergency County Hospital Timisoara: Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Timisoara
7 Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu Faculty of Medicine: Universitatea Lucian Blaga din Sibiu Facultatea de Medicina

DOI: 10.2478jccm-2024-0010

Introduction: This study is part of a European survey on delivery room practices endorsed by the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS) and the Romanian Association of Neonatology (ANR). The aim of our study was to evaluate the current neonatal resuscitation practices in Romanian maternity hospitals and to compare the results between level III and level II centers.
Material and Methods: The questionnaire was distributed through ANR by email link to heads of neonatal departments of 53 Romanian maternity hospitals with more than one thousand of births per year between October 2019 and September 2020, having 2018 as the reference year for data collection.
Results: The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 62.26% (33/53), 83.33% (15/18) for level-III centers and 51.43% (18/35) for level-II centers. Of the responding centers, 18 (54,54%) were academic hospitals, 15 (83,33%) were level III and 3 (16,67%) level II hospitals. In 2018, responding centers reported 81.139 births representing 42.66% of all Romanian births (190.170). There were significant differences between level-III and level-II maternity hospitals regarding the number of births in 2018 (3028.73±1258.38 vs 1983.78±769.99; P=0.006), lowest GA of routinely assisted infants in delivery room (25.07±3.03 weeks vs 30.44±3.28, P<0.001), inborn infants with BW<1500 admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in 2018 (66.86±39.14 g vs 22.87±31.50 g; P=0.002), and antenatal counseling of parents before the delivery of a very preterm infant or an infant with expected problems (60% vs 22.2%; P=0.027). There were no significant differences of thermal and umbilical cord management, positive pressure delivery, heart rate assessment between responding centers.
Conclusion: The adherence to new guidelines was high among responding centers regarding thermal and umbilical cord management, initial FiO2, but aspects like antenatal counseling, EKG monitoring, laryngeal mask, and heated/humidified gases availability and administration, and simulation-based training require further implementation.